Posts Tagged ‘Neutral Milk Hotel’

Ignored 78: Big breaks

In Uncategorized on March 11, 2016 at 12:49 am



Ignored 41: Superchunkish

In Uncategorized on September 11, 2014 at 3:53 am


A Google search doesn’t give any firm proof that Superchunk’s publishing company is (actually) called All the Songs Sound the Same. Aside from mention in a number of articles and blog posts.

Check the liner notes on your fave ‘hunk album. It’s legit.

Given drummer Jon Wurster’s penchant for comedy/theatre, it’s possible this could have just been a goof on fans and haters alike, and a reclaiming of the most common attack of the band’s loud, fast first 10 years. It’s a fair statement either way (at least for their first four full-lengths) but considering that collective tune was awesome, should we care if all the songs sound the same? Probably not.

Loosely related, Superchunk frontman and Merge Records co-founder Mac McCaughan recently guested on Marc Maron’s WTF podcast. He gave a fairly dense account of the past quarter century of his band and the slow, steady incline of Merge itself. Considering the label was initially just a vehicle for getting Superchunk records out (and even they bailed for their first three studio albums), Merge is most definitely “a big deal” in 2014, the home base for top sellers like the Arcade Fire and Spoon as well as the rights holder for the (slightly insane) uptick in Neutral Milk Hotel’s fandom.

Superchunk is still putting out albums on occasion, the most recent being last year’s well-received I Hate Music. New Superchunk songs haven’t really sounded like “that other Superchunk song” since 1997 or so. That year’s Indoor Living full-length added a ton of keyboards to the mix, seemingly in a conscious effort to mature their sound… or something. It was totally fine but personally, I miss “that other Superchunk song” that they allegedly repurposed over and over and over.

… and over.

Ironically, 1994’s full-length Foolish seemed like a conscious effort to mature as well, especially the lead-off, pseudo-title track “Like a Fool” that played at quarter speed and featured McCaughan cooing rather than customarily yelping.

A huge departure at the time but then, the band totally fell off the wagon with 1995’s Here’s Where the Strings Come In, an awesome album that had a loose geography/air travel theme and a minor, minor hit (“Hyper Enough”) that almost sounded like the band trying to set a purposeful counterweight to Foolish‘s off-speed stuff.

ANYWAY, if Superchunk supposedly wrote the exact same song several dozen times between 1989 and 1995, what should be considered the most Superchunkish Superchunk song?

To answer this important question, I took a sample of every Superchunk song that appeared on their first five full-length albums (Superchunk, No Pocky for Kitty, On the Mouth, Foolish, Here’s Where the Strings Come In) plus their first two singles/rarity compilations (Tossing Seeds: Singles 89-91, Incidental Music 91-95).

I omitted a few tracks, since they weren’t Superchunk originals:
Chills, The sing “Night of Chill Blue”
Flys, The sing “Night Creatures”
Magnetic Fields, The sing “100,000 Fireflies”
Motörhead sing “I’ll Be Your Sister”
Sebadoh sings “Brand New Love”
Sebadoh sings “It’s So Hard to Fall in Love”
Shangri-Las, The sing “Train from Kansas City”
Verlaines, The sing “Lying in State”

In the case of early singles “Slack Motherfucker”, “Seed Toss”, “My Noise”, “Cast Iron” and “Mower”, they all appeared as singles prior to appearing on full-lengths so I omitted the album versions since… I dunno, single versions tend to be cooler. I also axed the acoustic version of “Throwing Things”. Anecdotally, it’s quiet. It shouldn’t win.

Lastly, for the compilation tracks, I denoted the year the song was first released rather than the year the compilation was released. This worked out great with the exception of the previously unreleased “Makeout Bench” which was recorded way back in 1990 but didn’t surface until Incidental music dropped in 1995. Great track BTW!

So this leaves a sample of 75 songs. Of these songs, each song will be analyzed in four categories with each category given a 1.0 score is the tune ranks “most average”:
– Year of release (by year)
– Song length (in seconds)
– Song title (in words)
– Speed (in a subjective scale of 1 being “slow”, 2 being “kinda slow”, 3 being “average”, 4 being “kinda fast” and 5 being “fast”)

Think of it as a 4.0 GPA average crossed with rotisserie baseball. In short, this is massively nerdy.

Based on these rankings, the more Superchunkish Superchunk song would have these characteristics:
– Released in 1993
– 215 seconds long
– Two word song title
– Speed = fast

The closest match is this song…

Here is the Top 20 ranking of “Most Superchunkish Superchunk Songs” by this rating system. Enjoy!


Ignored 38: Same songs, new price

In Uncategorized on July 17, 2014 at 4:15 pm


UK shoegaze outfit Slowdive play Toronto this fall. They last played our city 20 years ago and tickets this time around have increased in price by 168 per cent ($11 in 1994, $29.50 in 2014).

That’s perfectly fine and expected. Because in pure economic terms, nostalgia comes at a high price.


Whether your vice is music, sports memorabilia, out-of-print literature or visiting Europe (or whatever “the old country” means to you), people will pay a significant premium to purchase something NOW that makes them feel a tinge of something from THEN.

Still, some jerks music fans like to get all uppity when a band like Slowdive reunites and their ticket prices skyrocket. The thing is, when you think of it in terms of simple supply and demand, why wouldn’t these prices spike?!? In 1994, the audience for Slowdive was mop-haired guys and girls who didn’t talk much plus assorted wannabe Anglophiles. In 2014, the audience is two additional decades worth of that type of music fan…. plus the entire original audience itself (except for those who died or moved to Courtice in the years since).

Demand goes up. Supply stays, more or less, the same. Do the math!

For more information and to learn more theories, go here. It’s a great place.

Getting back to Slowdive, a lot of notable bands have reunited in the last decade. However, even when compared to many of their contemporaries, returning after a 20 year absence is pretty rare. It begs the question: does staying away longer help pad your bottom line in terms of ticket prices?


To help answer this question, I took a cross section of 18 of these notable bands who have returned to Toronto in the last decade after some sort of hiatus. I compared ticket prices for the “farewell” and “hello again” gigs and in an attempt to keep this apples-to-apples, I only included headline shows. This latter piece gets kinda dicey when we speak in terms of demand (i.e. the Constantines’ headline “reunion” show in Toronto this fall will technically be the third time they’ve played in the city since reuniting) but more on that later…

Also, none of the prices reflect services charges, venue fees or anything of that nature. Because people tend to hate taking about services charges, venue fees or anything of that nature.

Here is a list of the 18 bands in question, sorted by the year they returned to Toronto and also showing their last Toronto show before they disappeared for a while:


Now, the first graph below shows who had the longest gap between Toronto headline shows. The second graph shows who had the largest spike in ticket prices, expressed in terms of price percentage increase.



If there was a decent correlation between length of absence and increase in ticket price, these graphs should look somewhat similar shape-wise.

They don’t. At all.

Therefore, based on this (admittedly small) sample size, there is no real correlation between how long you’ve been away and how much you can jack up your prices.

Since the length of the hiatus, in and of itself, isn’t significant in boosting ticket prices across the board, here are a few less scientific factors that are:

Taste: I mean, this is 90 per cent of the equation with any art, right? A few of these bands (especially My Bloody Valentine, the Pixies and Neutral Milk Hotel) became almost mythical during the 2000s due to the proliferations of blogs and YouTube and MP3s. Thus, when they started popping up on the touring circuit again, their fan bases has swollen to kind of insane proportions. Well, maybe not INSANE since MBV was originally booked to play the Ricoh Coliseum in 2008 (which would’ve been “whack”) before being downsized to the Kool Haus. But still. NOTE: the Ricoh Coliseum website is still erroneously listing the concert. They so crazy!

Venue: When Jesse Keeler posted this note on a Death From Above 1979 forum back in 2006 in order to napalm his band, it meant that the duo’s last headline show in Toronto was a series of insanely loud gigs at the cozy Horseshoe Tavern the summer prior. Based on their popularity at the time, it easily could’ve been a room 5x as big. But in the end, it was happenstance. Either way, $15 for a DFA1979 gig in 2005 was a “bargoon“.

Non-Headline Gigs: The Constantines played their first 2014 reunion show in nearby Guelph, rocked at Broken Social Scene’s Field Trip festival shortly thereafter and will be opening for the Arcade Fire at the Molson Amphitheatre around Labour Day. Their first “proper” Toronto headline show isn’t until October but given their “around-ness” prior, did THAT affect ticket price for their Danforth Music Hall gig? Who cares… it’s just good to have ’em back!

Opening Acts: I’ve always had a soft spot for the macho riffing and self-aware posturing of Urge Overkill. However, their 1995 “bye bye” gig at The Phoenix also featured the Toronto debut (I think) of the equally-awesome Guided by Voices and the pre-Sweet Homewrecker hijinks of Thrush Hermit. A stacked triple bill and considering GBV were getting a ton of buzz at that time, I bet much of the audience were paying to see Robert Pollard and friends stumble around. Unfortunately, Bob got beat up.

Willingness to Tour… Ever: Most people just assumed that Jeff Mangum would never tour Neutral Milk Hotel so the fact that their ticket prices dominate the second graph is a bit of an outlier. Even by 1998 standards, $7 for any show is massively low. Also worth noting: fact Mangum did a pair of solo acoustic sets in Toronto in 2011, which may have eased demand a touch.

A few other comments:

– Everybody kinda rags on the Pixies for their never-ending reunion tour and the fact that it took them a decade to release anything new (and that was only after they gave Kim Deal the boot). However, considering how unlikely that reunion was (see “the fax story”) you think they could’ve charged more than $35 for their first Toronto show back in 2004. In many ways, they ushered in the initial wave of reunions fuelled by 1990s nostalgia (and cash… lots of it). If they had decided to suck it in 2008 instead of the hinterlands of 2004, I betcha tickets would’ve easily run $60 or more. Even at the brutal Arrow Hall, which mercifully is no longer with us as a concert venue.

– The Jesus and Mary Chain were a good band. Not amazing but solid enough. But seriously, $60+ for their 2012 show? Unlikely My Bloody Valentine, Neutral Milk Hotel or Daft Punk, the Jesus and Mary Chain had played Toronto plenty in the past so it’s not like their originally fan base didn’t have ample opportunity to see ’em in the first time around. Heck, they brought along Curve, Spiritualized and (uh) Pure to play the (friggin’) SkyDome in 1992, which is was kind of a WTF at the time and is now a massive WTF in hindsight. That concert was $12.45 BTW. Good deal!!

– Speculative: if Morrissey decides to drop the seal hunt thing and play in Canada again, would tickets START at more than $100 a piece? I think so.

– My picks for the next wave of bands that we MIGHT see playing shows again within the next five years: Oasis, the Deadly Snakes (this show notwithstanding), Galaxie 500, Gene (would we care?!?), the Kinks (would they care?!?), Eric’s Trip (again), Siouxsie and the Banshees (again), Catherine Wheel (are they even broken up?!?), Local Rabbits, Gorky’s Zygotic Mynci, Supergrass, the White Stripes